Review Article| Volume 35, ISSUE 1, P61-69, February 2023

Patient-Specific Implants in Orthognathic Surgery

Published:November 03, 2022DOI:


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Leung M.Y.
        • Leung Y.Y.
        Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular asymmetry: a new classification and three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 47: 1043-1051
        • Yeung A.W.K.
        • Wong N.S.M.
        • Li D.T.S.
        • et al.
        Is there a difference between the thicknesses of the rami in mandibular asymmetry?.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 50: 791-797
        • Quast A.
        • Santander P.
        • Witt D.
        • et al.
        Traditional face-bow transfer versus three-dimensional virtual reconstruction in orthognathic surgery.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 48: 347-354
        • Zizelmann C.
        • Hammer B.
        • Gellrich N.C.
        • et al.
        An evaluation of face-bow transfer for the planning of orthognathic surgery.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70: 1944-1950
        • Li B.
        • Wei H.
        • Jiang T.
        • et al.
        Randomized Clinical Trial of the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Implants versus CAD/CAM Splints in Orthognathic Surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 148: 1101-1110
        • Au S.W.
        • Li D.T.S.
        • Su Y.X.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of Self-designed 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Surgical Guides and Fixation Plates for Advancement Genioplasty<<<<<<.
        Int J Comput Dent. 2022; 0: 0
        • Yang W.F.
        • Zhang C.Y.
        • Choi W.S.
        • et al.
        A novel 'surgeon-dominated' approach to the design of 3D-printed patient-specific surgical plates in mandibular reconstruction: a proof-of-concept study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 49: 13-21
        • Attar H.
        • Calin M.
        • Zhang L.C.
        • et al.
        Manufacture by selective laser melting and mechanical behavior of commercially pure titanium.
        Mater Sci Eng A. 2014; 593: 170-177
        • Haglin J.M.
        • Eltorai A.E.
        • Gil J.A.
        • et al.
        Patient-Specific Orthopaedic Implants.
        Orthop Surg. 2016; 8: 417-424
        • Cheng T.
        • Zhao S.
        • Peng X.
        • et al.
        Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20: 1307-1322
        • Small T.
        • Krebs V.
        • Molloy R.
        • et al.
        Comparison of acetabular shell position using patient specific instruments vs. standard surgical instruments: a randomized clinical trial.
        J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29: 1030-1037
        • Schemitsch E.H.
        • Richards R.R.
        The effect of malunion on functional outcome after plate fixation of fractures of both bones of the forearm in adults.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74: 1068-1078
        • van de Vijfeijken S.
        • Schreurs R.
        • Dubois L.
        • et al.
        The use of cranial resection templates with 3D virtual planning and PEEK patient-specific implants: A 3 year follow-up.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019; 47: 542-547
        • Gander T.
        • Essig H.
        • Metzler P.
        • et al.
        Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43: 126-130
        • Yang W.F.
        • Choi W.S.
        • Leung Y.Y.
        • et al.
        Three-dimensional printing of patient-specific surgical plates in head and neck reconstruction: A prospective pilot study.
        Oral Oncol. 2018; 78: 31-36
        • Rückschloß T.
        • Ristow O.
        • Müller M.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of patient-specific implants and additive-manufactured surgical splints in orthognathic surgery - A three-dimensional retrospective study.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019; 47: 847-853
        • Alkhayer A.
        • Piffkó J.
        • Lippold C.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review.
        Head Face Med. 2020; 16: 34
        • Heufelder M.
        • Wilde F.
        • Pietzka S.
        • et al.
        Clinical accuracy of waferless maxillary positioning using customized surgical guides and patient specific osteosynthesis in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017; 45: 1578-1585
        • Suojanen J.
        • Leikola J.
        • Stoor P.
        The use of patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery: A series of 32 maxillary osteotomy patients.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016; 44: 1913-1916
      1. Leung YY, Leung JKC, Li ATC et al. Accuracy and Safety of In-House Surgeon-Designed Three-Dimensional Printed Patient Specific Implants for Wafer-less Le Fort I Osteotomy. Hong Kong International Dental Expo And Symposium; December 10–12, 2021; Hong Kong 2021.

        • Rückschloß T.
        • Ristow O.
        • Kühle R.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of laser-melted patient-specific implants in genioplasty - A three-dimensional retrospective study.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020; 48: 653-660
        • Li B.
        • Wang S.
        • Wei H.
        • et al.
        The use of patient-specific implants in genioplasty and its clinical accuracy: a preliminary study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 49: 461-465
        • Li B.
        • Wei H.
        • Zeng F.
        • et al.
        Application of A Novel Three-dimensional Printing Genioplasty Template System and Its Clinical Validation: A Control Study.
        Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 5431
        • Goodson A.M.C.
        • Parmar S.
        • Ganesh S.
        • et al.
        Printed titanium implants in UK craniomaxillofacial surgery. Part II: perceived performance (outcomes, logistics, and costs).
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 59: 320-328
        • Ma L.
        • Cheng S.
        • Ji X.
        • et al.
        Immobilizing magnesium ions on 3D printed porous tantalum scaffolds with polydopamine for improved vascularization and osteogenesis.
        Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020; 117: 111303
        • Kabiri A.
        • Liaghat G.
        • Alavi F.
        • et al.
        A comparative study of 3D printing and heat-compressing methods for manufacturing the thermoplastic composite bone fixation plate: Design, characterization, and in vitro biomechanical experimentation.
        Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2021; 235: 1439-1452
        • MacLeod A.
        • Patterson M.
        • MacTear K.
        • et al.
        3D printed locking osteosynthesis screw threads have comparable strength to machined or hand-tapped screw threads.
        J Orthop Res. 2020; 38: 1559-1565
        • Esmaeili S.
        • Akbari Aghdam H.
        • Motififard M.
        • et al.
        A porous polymeric-hydroxyapatite scaffold used for femur fractures treatment: fabrication, analysis, and simulation.
        Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020; 30: 123-131