Advertisement

Shape-Memory Retained Complete Arch Guided Implant Treatment Using Nitinol (Smileloc) Abutments

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Beumer J.
        • Faulkner R.F.
        • Shah K.C.
        • et al.
        Fundamentals of implant dentistry. vol. 1. Prosthodontic principles. 1st edition.
        Quintessence Publishing, Hanover Park (IL)2015
        • Goodacre C.J.
        • Bernal G.
        • Rungcharassaeng K.
        • et al.
        Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90: 121-132
        • Korsch M.
        • Obst U.
        • Walther W.
        Cement-associated peri-implantitis: a retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 797-802
        • Wilson T.G.
        The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study.
        J Periodontol. 2009; 80: 1388-1392
        • Shah K.C.
        • Seo Y.R.
        • Wu B.M.
        Clinical application of a shape memory implant abutment system.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 8-12
        • Lee S.J.
        • Betensky R.A.
        • Gianneschi G.E.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 715-719
        • Papaspyridakos P.
        • Gallucci G.O.
        • Chen C.J.
        • et al.
        Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 465-472
        • Amin S.
        • Weber H.P.
        • Finkelman M.
        • et al.
        Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 1360-1367
        • Rangel F.A.
        • Maal T.J.
        • Bergé S.J.
        • et al.
        Integration of digital dental casts in 3-dimensional facial photographs.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134: 820-826
        • Hassan B.
        • Gimenez Gonzalez B.
        • Tahmaseb A.
        • et al.
        A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: a pilot clinical study.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 486-492
        • Jacobs R.
        • Adriansens A.
        • Naert I.
        • et al.
        Predictability of reformatted computed tomography for pre- operative planning of endosseous implants.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999; 28: 37-41
        • van Steenberghe D.
        • Naert I.
        • Andersson M.
        • et al.
        A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 663-670