Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 22, ISSUE 3, P387-405, August 2010

Soft Tissue Considerations in Implant Site Development

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Berglundh T.
        • Lindhe J.
        • Ericsson I.
        • et al.
        The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991; 2: 81-90
        • Buser D.
        • Weber H.
        • Donath K.
        • et al.
        Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs.
        J Periodontol. 1992; 63: 225-235
        • Berglundh T.
        • Abrahamsson I.
        • Welander M.
        • et al.
        Morphogenesis of the peri-implant mucosa: an experimental study in dogs.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18: 1-8
        • Gould T.
        • Westbury L.
        • Brunette D.
        Ultrastructural study of the attachment of human gingiva to titanium in vivo.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 52: 418-420
        • Steflik D.
        • Corpe R.
        • Young T.
        • et al.
        The biologic tissue responses to uncoated and coated implanted biomaterials.
        Adv Dent Res. 1999; 13: 27-33
        • Listgarten M.
        Soft and hard tissue response to endosseous dental implants.
        Anat Rec. 1996; 245: 410-425
        • Chehroudi B.
        • Gould T.
        • Brunette D.
        The role of connective tissue in inhibiting epithelial downgrowth on titanium-coated percutaneous implants.
        J Biomed Mater Res. 1992; 26: 493-515
        • Nevins M.
        • Nevins M.
        • Camelo M.
        • et al.
        Human histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to a dental implant.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008; 28: 111-121
        • Abrahamsson I.
        • Zitzmann N.
        • Berglundh T.
        • et al.
        The mucosal attachment to titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in dogs.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29: 448-455
        • Berglundh T.
        • Lindhe J.
        Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited.
        J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 23: 971-973
        • Stern I.
        Current concepts of the dentogingival junction: the epithelial and connective tissue attachments to the tooth.
        J Periodontol. 1981; 52: 465-476
        • Ericsson I.
        • Lindhe J.
        Probing depth at implants and teeth. An experimental study in the dog.
        J Clin Periodontol. 1993; 20: 623-627
        • Broggini N.
        • McManus L.
        • Hermann J.
        • et al.
        Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface.
        J Dent Res. 2006; 85: 473-478
        • Teté S.
        • Mastrangelo F.
        • Bianchi A.
        • et al.
        Collagen fiber orientation around machined titanium and zirconia dental implant necks: an animal study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 52-58
        • Traini T.
        • Degidi M.
        • Caputi S.
        • et al.
        Collagen fiber orientation in human peri-implant bone around immediately loaded and unloaded titanium dental implants.
        J Periodontol. 2005; 76: 83-89
        • Traini T.
        • Pecora G.
        • Iezzi G.
        • et al.
        Preferred collagen fiber orientation human peri-implant bone after a short- and long-term loading period: a case report.
        J Oral Implantol. 2006; 32: 177-181
        • Schwarz F.
        • Ferrari D.
        • Herten M.
        • et al.
        Effects of surface hydrophilicity and microtopography on early stages of soft and hard tissue integration at non-submerged titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs.
        J Periodontol. 2007; 78: 2171-2184
        • Moon I.
        • Berglundh T.
        • Abrahamsson I.
        • et al.
        The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implant. An experimental study in the dog.
        J Clin Periodontol. 1999; 26: 658-663
        • Abrahamsson I.
        • Berglundh T.
        • Glantz P.
        • et al.
        The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs.
        J Clin Periodontol. 1998; 25: 721-727
        • Romanos G.
        • Schröter-Kermani C.
        • Weingart D.
        • et al.
        Health human periodontal versus peri-implant gingival tissues: an immunohistochemical differentiation of the extracellular matrix.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 10: 750-758
        • Davies J.
        Mechanisms of endosseous integration.
        Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11: 391-401
        • Davies J.
        Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing.
        J Dent Educ. 2003; 67: 932-949
        • Araújo M.
        • Lindhe J.
        Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32: 212-218
        • Kim B.
        • Kim Y.
        • Yun P.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of peri-implant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107: e24-e28
        • Abrahamsson I.
        • Berglundh T.
        • Lindhe J.
        The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs.
        J Clin Periodontol. 1997; 24: 568-572
        • Linkevicius T.
        • Apse P.
        • Grybauskas S.
        • et al.
        The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 712-719
        • Cairo F.
        • Pagliaro U.
        • Nieri M.
        Soft tissue management at implant sites.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35: 163-167
        • Bouri A.J.
        • Bissada N.
        • Al-Zahrani M.
        • et al.
        Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23: 323-326
        • Klinge B.
        • Flemmig T.
        Tissue augmentation and esthetics (Working Group 3).
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 166-170
        • Kois J.
        Predictable single-tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys.
        Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004; 25 (898, 900 passim [quiz: 906–7]): 895-896
        • Jung R.
        • Holderegger C.
        • Sailer I.
        • et al.
        The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008; 28: 357-365
        • Gargiulo A.W.
        • Wentz F.M.
        • Orban B.
        Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans.
        J Periodontol. 1961; 32: 261-267
        • Perez J.
        • Smukler H.
        • Nunn M.
        Clinical evaluation of the supraosseous gingivae before and after crown lengthening.
        J Periodontol. 2007; 78: 1023-1030
        • Barboza E.
        • MonteAlto R.
        • Ferreira V.
        • et al.
        Supracrestal gingival tissue measurements in healthy human periodontium.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008; 28: 55-61
        • Vacek J.
        • Gher M.
        • Assad D.
        • et al.
        The dimensions of the human dentogingival junction.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994; 14: 154-165
        • Maynard J.J.
        • Wilson R.
        Physiologic dimensions of the periodontium significant to the restorative dentist.
        J Periodontol. 1979; 50: 170-174
        • Abrahamsson I.
        • Berglundh T.
        • Moon I.
        • et al.
        Peri-implant tissues at submerged and non-submerged titanium implants.
        J Clin Periodontol. 1999; 26: 600-607
        • Hermann J.
        • Buser D.
        • Schenk R.
        • et al.
        Biologic width around titanium implants. A physiologically formed and stable dimension over time.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11: 1-11
        • Hermann J.
        • Buser D.
        • Schenk R.
        • et al.
        Biologic width around one- and two-piece titanium implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12: 559-571
        • Bakaeen L.
        • Quinlan P.
        • Schoolfield J.
        • et al.
        The biologic width around titanium implants: histometric analysis of the implantogingival junction around immediately and early loaded implants.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009; 29: 297-305
        • Buser D.
        • Mericske-Stern R.
        • Bernard J.
        • et al.
        Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997; 8: 161-172
        • Hermann J.
        • Cochran D.
        • Nummikoski P.
        • et al.
        Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
        J Periodontol. 1997; 68: 1117-1130
        • Quirynen M.
        • van Steenberghe D.
        Bacterial colonization of the internal part of two-stage implants. An in vivo study.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993; 4: 158-161
        • Tarnow D.
        • Cho S.
        • Wallace S.
        The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest.
        J Periodontol. 2000; 71: 546-549
        • Hermann J.
        • Schoolfield J.
        • Schenk R.
        • et al.
        Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
        J Periodontol. 2001; 72: 1372-1383
        • Piattelli A.
        • Vrespa G.
        • Petrone G.
        • et al.
        Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: a retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys.
        J Periodontol. 2003; 74: 346-352
        • Todescan F.
        • Pustiglioni F.
        • Imbronito A.
        • et al.
        Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 467-472
        • Van Assche N.
        • Collaert B.
        • Coucke W.
        • et al.
        Correlation between early perforation of cover screws and marginal bone loss: a retrospective study.
        J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35: 76-79
        • Tal H.
        Spontaneous early exposure of submerged implants: I. Classification and clinical observations.
        J Periodontol. 1999; 70: 213-219
        • Tal H.
        • Artzi Z.
        • Moses O.
        • et al.
        Spontaneous early exposure of submerged endosseous implants resulting in crestal bone loss: a clinical evaluation between stage I and stage II surgery.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16: 514-521
        • Jeong S.
        • Choi B.
        • Li J.
        • et al.
        The effect of thick mucosa on peri-implant tissues: an experimental study in dogs.
        J Periodontol. 2008; 79: 2151-2155
        • Cosyn J.
        • Sabzevar M.
        • De Wilde P.
        • et al.
        Two-piece implants with turned versus microtextured collars.
        J Periodontol. 2007; 78: 1657-1663
        • Subramani K.
        • Jung R.
        • Molenberg A.
        • et al.
        Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 616-626
        • Trammell K.
        • Geurs N.
        • O'Neal S.J.
        • et al.
        A prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of platform-switched and matched-abutment implants in short-span partial denture situations.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009; 29: 599-605
        • López-Marí L.
        • Calvo-Guirado J.
        • Martín-Castellote B.
        • et al.
        Implant platform switching concept: an updated review.
        Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009; 14: e450-e454
        • Hürzeler M.
        • Fickl S.
        • Zuhr O.
        • et al.
        Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 33-39
        • Weiner S.
        • Simon J.
        • Ehrenberg D.
        • et al.
        The effects of laser microtextured collars upon crestal bone levels of dental implants.
        Implant Dent. 2008; 17: 217-228
        • Pecora G.
        • Ceccarelli R.
        • Bonelli M.
        • et al.
        Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants.
        Implant Dent. 2009; 18: 57-66
        • Tarnow D.
        • Magner A.
        • Fletcher P.
        The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla.
        J Periodontol. 1992; 63: 995-996
        • Choquet V.
        • Hermans M.
        • Adriaenssens P.
        • et al.
        Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region.
        J Periodontol. 2001; 72: 1364-1371
        • Jemt T.
        Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997; 17: 326-333
        • Kourkouta S.
        • Dedi K.
        • Paquette D.
        • et al.
        Interproximal tissue dimensions in relation to adjacent implants in the anterior maxilla: clinical observations and patient aesthetic evaluation.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 1375-1385
        • Tarnow D.
        • Elian N.
        • Fletcher P.
        • et al.
        Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants.
        J Periodontol. 2003; 74: 1785-1788
        • Reddy M.
        • O'Neal S.
        • Haigh S.
        • et al.
        Initial clinical efficacy of 3-mm implants immediately placed into function in conditions of limited spacing.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23: 281-288
        • Weber H.P.
        • Buser D.
        • Belser U.C.
        Examination of the candidate for implant therapy.
        in: Lang N.P. Lindhe J. 5th edition. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. vol. 1. Blackwell Publishing, Ames (IA)2009: 587-597
        • Warrer K.
        • Buser D.
        • Lang N.
        • et al.
        Plaque-induced peri-implantitis in the presence or absence of keratinized mucosa. An experimental study in monkeys.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995; 6: 131-138
        • Schrott A.
        • Jimenez M.
        • Hwang J.
        • et al.
        Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 1170-1177
        • Wennström J.
        • Bengazi F.
        • Lekholm U.
        The influence of the masticatory mucosa on the peri-implant soft tissue condition.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994; 5: 1-8
        • Cooper L.
        Objective criteria: guiding and evaluating dental implant esthetics.
        J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008; 20: 195-205
        • Kopp F.R.
        • Belser U.
        Esthetic checklist for the fixed prosthesis.
        in: Sharer P. Kopp F.R. Rinn L.A. Esthetic guidelines for restorative dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Co, Chicago (IL)1982: 187-192
        • Wilson D.
        Ridge mapping for determination of alveolar ridge width.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989; 4: 41-43
        • Olsson M.
        • Lindhe J.
        Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors.
        J Clin Periodontol. 1991; 18: 78-82
        • Weisgold A.
        Contours of the full crown restoration.
        Alpha Omegan. 1977; 70: 77-89
        • Olsson M.
        • Lindhe J.
        • Marinello C.
        On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents.
        J Clin Periodontol. 1993; 20: 570-577
        • Becker W.
        • Ochsenbein C.
        • Tibbetts L.
        • et al.
        Alveolar bone anatomic profiles as measured from dry skulls. Clinical ramifications.
        J Clin Periodontol. 1997; 24: 727-731
        • Seibert J.S.
        Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. I. Technique and wound healing.
        Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1983; 4: 437-453
        • Palacci P.
        • Nowzari H.
        Soft tissue enhancement around dental implants.
        Periodontol 2000. 2008; 47: 113-132
        • Priest G.
        The esthetic challenge of adjacent implants.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 2-12
        • Grunder U.
        • Gracis S.
        • Capelli M.
        Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005; 25: 113-119
        • Kan J.
        • Rungcharassaeng K.
        Interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone: a report of six consecutive cases.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23: 249-259
        • Magne P.
        • Belser U.
        Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition. A biomimetic approach.
        in: Quintessence, Carol Stream (IL)2002
        • Rufenacht C.R.
        Principles of esthetic integration.
        in: Quintessence Publishing, Chicago (IL)2000
        • Esposito M.
        • Ekestubbe A.
        • Gröndahl K.
        Radiological evaluation of marginal bone loss at tooth surfaces facing single Brånemark implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993; 4: 151-157
        • Gasparini D.
        Double-fold connective tissue pedicle graft: a novel approach for ridge augmentation.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004; 24: 280-287
        • Adell R.
        • Eriksson B.
        • Lekholm U.
        • et al.
        Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5: 347-359
        • Becker W.
        • Becker B.
        Guided tissue regeneration for implants placed into extraction sockets and for implant dehiscences: surgical techniques and case report.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1990; 10: 376-391
        • Goldstein M.
        • Boyan B.
        • Schwartz Z.
        The palatal advanced flap: a pedicle flap for primary coverage of immediately placed implants.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13: 644-650
        • Nemcovsky C.
        • Artzi Z.
        • Moses O.
        Rotated split palatal flap for soft tissue primary coverage over extraction sites with immediate implant placement. Description of the surgical procedure and clinical results.
        J Periodontol. 1999; 70: 926-934
        • Nemcovsky C.
        • Artzi Z.
        • Moses O.
        Rotated palatal flap in immediate implant procedures. Clinical evaluation of 26 consecutive cases.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11: 83-90
        • Khoury F.
        • Happe A.
        The palatal subepithelial connective tissue flap method for soft tissue management to cover maxillary defects: a clinical report.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15: 415-418
        • Simons A.
        • Darany D.
        • Giordano J.
        The use of free gingival grafts in the treatment of peri-implant soft tissue complications: clinical report.
        Implant Dent. 1993; 2: 27-30
        • Hoelscher D.
        • Simons A.
        The rationale for soft-tissue grafting and vestibuloplasty in association with endosseous implants: a literature review.
        J Oral Implantol. 1994; 20: 282-291
        • Langer B.
        • Calagna L.
        The subepithelial connective tissue graft.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1980; 44: 363-367
        • Edel A.
        The use of a connective tissue graft for closure over an immediate implant covered with occlusive membrane.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995; 6: 60-65
        • Bianchi A.
        • Sanfilippo F.
        Single-tooth replacement by immediate implant and connective tissue graft: a 1-9-year clinical evaluation.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 269-277
        • Covani U.
        • Marconcini S.
        • Galassini G.
        • et al.
        Connective tissue graft used as a biologic barrier to cover an immediate implant.
        J Periodontol. 2007; 78: 1644-1649
        • Burkhardt R.
        • Joss A.
        • Lang N.
        Soft tissue dehiscence coverage around endosseous implants: a prospective cohort study.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 451-457
        • Kan J.
        • Rungcharassaeng K.
        • Lozada J.
        Bilaminar subepithelial connective tissue grafts for immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone.
        J Calif Dent Assoc. 2005; 33: 865-871
        • Park J.
        Increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around endosseous implant using acellular dermal matrix allograft.
        Implant Dent. 2006; 15: 275-281
      1. Geurs N, Romanos A, Vassilopoulos P, et al. Efficacy of micronized acellular dermal graft for use in interproximal papillae regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, in press.

        • Park S.
        • Wang H.
        Management of localized buccal dehiscence defect with allografts and acellular dermal matrix.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006; 26: 589-595
        • El Helow K.
        • El Askary A.S.
        Regenerative barriers in immediate implant placement: a literature review.
        Implant Dent. 2008; 17: 360-371
        • Park S.
        • Lee K.
        • Oh T.
        • et al.
        Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 32-41
        • Chen S.
        • Darby I.
        • Reynolds E.
        • et al.
        Immediate implant placement postextraction without flap elevation.
        J Periodontol. 2009; 80: 163-172
        • Grunder U.
        The inlay-graft technique to create papillae between implants.
        J Esthet Dent. 1997; 9: 165-168
        • Azzi R.
        • Etienne D.
        • Takei H.
        • et al.
        Surgical thickening of the existing gingiva and reconstruction of interdental papillae around implant-supported restorations.
        Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002; 22: 71-77
        • Reddy M.
        Achieving gingival esthetics.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134 ([quiz: 337–8]): 295-304
        • Sachdeva K.
        • Kula K.
        • Hains F.
        Provisional restoration to preserve interdental papillae in the esthetic zone: a case report.
        J Indiana Dent Assoc. 2009; 88: 31-35